Comparative Cost Utility Analysis of Plerixafor Plus GCSF Versus Cyclophosphamide Plus GCSF as Salvage Mobilization Regimens in Multiple Myeloma Patients
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone versus thalidomide plus dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a comparative analysis of 411 patients.
The objective of this case-control study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (len/dex) versus thalidomide plus dexamethasone (thal/dex) as initial therapy for newly diagnosed myeloma. We retrospectively studied 411 newly diagnosed patients treated with len/dex (228) or thal/dex (183) at the Mayo Clinic. The differences were similar in a matched-pair analy...
متن کاملCLINICAL TRIALS AND OBSERVATIONS Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone versus thalidomide plus dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a comparative analysis of 411 patients
The objective of this case-control study was to compare the efficacy and toxicity of lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (len/ dex) versus thalidomide plus dexamethasone (thal/dex) as initial therapy for newly diagnosed myeloma. We retrospectively studied 411 newly diagnosed patients treated with len/dex (228) or thal/dex (183) at the Mayo Clinic. The differences were similar in a matched-pair anal...
متن کاملGrowth in children after bone marrow transplantation: busulfan plus cyclophosphamide versus cyclophosphamide plus total body irradiation.
Growth was assessed during the first and second years following bone marrow transplantation (BMT) in 47 children treated by either busulfan plus cyclophosphamide (BU/CY) (n = 24) or cyclophosphamide plus fractionated total body irradiation (CY/TBI) (n = 23). Before transplant, the median height was only 0.2 SD below age- and sex-adjusted means (range, -2.5 to +3.0). Height was greater than 2.0 ...
متن کاملCorrigendum to “Stem Cell Mobilization with G-CSF versus Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in Mexican Children”
[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1155/2016/4078215.].
متن کاملStem Cell Mobilization with G-CSF versus Cyclophosphamide plus G-CSF in Mexican Children
Fifty-six aphaereses were performed in 23 pediatric patients with malignant hematological and solid tumors, following three different protocols for PBPC mobilization and distributed as follows: A: seventeen mobilized with 4 g/m(2) of cyclophosphamide (CFA) and 10 μg/kg/day of granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), B: nineteen with CFA + G-CSF, and C: twenty only with G-CSF when the WBC ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation
سال: 2012
ISSN: 1083-8791
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.12.132